With the opening of the first evidence session on Tuesday, a massive inquiry into how the UK handled the Covid-19 pandemic and its effects opens its doors to the general public. Every single one of us was affected by the pandemic, and we all have questions. I questioned a variety of individuals who were in the center of the Covid storm to identify the one question that they all most want answered.
In order to celebrate his 29th birthday, Lobby Akinnola was scheduled to travel back to his family's house in Royal Leamington Spa, Warwickshire, when lockdown started in March 2020.
In contrast, he chose to remain at home in London without his parents and four siblings. His father, Femi, passed away a month later.
Lobby claims, "It changed my life for good.". The living room of our house is where he died while he was alone. At 60 years old, he was in good physical shape and overall good health. We never anticipated his passing. ".
Nearly 250,000 people have been killed by Covid in the UK, and Lobby, a member of the Covid Bereaved Families for Justice campaign group, wants to make sure that Femi's death was "not in vain.".
For him, the most important query is:. How can we better safeguard people in the event of a pandemic?
Examining the reasons why members of ethnic minorities were put at such higher risk will be a crucial component of that. They experienced worse results for no "physiological reason," claims Lobby. Instead, it is connected to society and the housing and employment opportunities that people from racial and ethnic minorities have access to.
But those who contracted Covid and died from it, as well as those who are still dealing with its aftereffects, are not the virus' only victims. The government's top medical advisor, Prof. Sir Chris Whitty, issued a warning about the indirect costs as restrictions were placed on the UK at the beginning of the pandemic. They were enormous.
Schools were closed, businesses were shut down, non-Covid treatment was postponed, and mixing was prohibited, preventing everything from socializing to visiting dying family members in their final days.
That has left a lasting legacy in the form of increased mental health issues, lost educational opportunities, and financial damage. Additionally, it can be seen in the high rates of non-Covid deaths and poor health that continue to exist as a result of neglected treatment for diseases like cancer and heart disease.
The investigation must therefore focus on why the government imposed restrictions and whether they were always necessary.
The first lockdown was difficult to avoid once the virus arrived, according to a senior public health official who was instrumental in the pandemic and is scheduled to testify. Simply stated, "We had no idea what we were dealing with. But the government shouldn't have been so quick to reimpose restrictions once the first wave had passed and scientists had gained more knowledge.
In the course of one 80-day period in the autumn of 2020, England went from having few restrictions to the "rule of six" limit on gatherings, tiers of regional restrictions, a national lockdown, and then back to tiers.
Because of restrictions on what officials can say in public before an inquiry, the official, who asked not to be named, claims that "we had so many rules and regulations that people could not keep up.". It was very top-down and oppressive. It contradicts all the research on what has been proven to be effective in disasters. ".
They therefore need to know:. How did the UK come to have laws that are so convoluted and complicated?
The official claims that Sweden made use of its population's strong social consciousness as one of its strategies. "In the UK, we didn't have enough faith in the populace, which was detrimental.
"We could've provided them with useful information and direction and let them take action. Overall, the public demonstrated throughout that they were watchful and responsible. The "biggest system failure" of the pandemic was closing schools to all students except the most vulnerable youngsters and those of important workers.
In the first lockdown, pubs and hair salons opened before schools in the UK, where students spent six months remote learning. After the second UK-wide lockdown, in early 2021, hair salons in Scotland made the same choice.
Even now, school attendance is lower than it was prior to the pandemic, which has caused Dame Rachel de Souza, England's children's commissioner, great concern about the effects this has had on children.
Her main request is thus:. How will we help kids recover from this harm and prevent it in the event of future pandemics?
"They want it quickly where they need additional support, whether it be because they are concerned about their mental health or because they are falling behind in school," Dame Rachel says.
"Children gave up so much to keep adults safe; we need to make sure we give something back, prioritizing their wellbeing.". ".
According to Prof. Jim McManus, president of the Association of Directors of Public Health, there is only one essential consideration:. How can lockdowns be avoided in upcoming pandemics?
Only if we are better prepared, take action as soon as possible, and have effective testing and contact tracing in place, he adds, will we be able to do that.
"It cost us because the UK, as well as a large portion of Europe and North America, were largely unprepared for a pandemic of this magnitude. ".
In late March, the UK decided to halt community testing. In England, a large-scale national contact tracing system wasn't put into operation until May, and it wasn't until September that the government began paying sick leave to those who were instructed to isolate.
Another issue that needs to be addressed is how care homes were supported.
The decision to move hospital patients into care homes in large numbers and the lack of testing and personal protective equipment (PPE) allowed the virus to spread quickly throughout the industry, resulting in about 40% of Covid deaths in the first few months.
Additionally, the NHS workforce wants a review of the 2010s' austerity measures.
Stuart Tuckwood, an adult nurse, had never worked in intensive care, but he was assigned there to take care of the sickest Covid patients during the first and second waves. At first, he worked through breaks out of concern that he wouldn't use up all of the PPE that was available.
The fact that I had to work in intensive care due to a shortage of qualified nurses, in his opinion, says it all. However, the fact that there were severe staffing shortages prior to the pandemic meant that it wasn't a surprise. ".
Furthermore, the NHS and other public services cannot wait until the investigation is over before fixing the issues.
Stuart says, "We need to act now; staff are having to go on strike to get the pay they need. " .
His main concern is therefore:. What steps should be taken to address staffing shortages in order to prevent a repeat of the problem?
Others are concerned about the wait for the inquiry.
An epidemiologist who provided advice to the government during the pandemic and who will also testify at the public inquiry but does not wish to be identified expresses concern that another pandemic may strike before the necessary adjustments have been made.
According to some, the investigation may take five years.
As it is being divided into six distinct modules, the inquiry team claims that recommendations will start next year.
The epidemiologist asserts, "The modular approach makes sense, but some elements will get drawn out too much,". Pandemics occur every 10 years, so we can't afford to wait. " .
They are particularly concerned about how judgment has deteriorated.
The epidemiologist claims that the use of restrictions was not subject to the same cost-benefit analysis as other policy decisions.
They therefore need to know:. How ought the system to be modified "so that we can work out the trade-offs" of the choices we make?
The phrase "follow the science" has lost a lot of its usefulness, according to the epidemiologist. "The uncertainty was never acknowledged.
Instead, we were forced to view it through Covid's limited perspective. I still worry that the investigation's focus isn't quite correct.
The investigation will reach the incorrect conclusions if it only considers Covid deaths that occurred in 2020 and 2021 and ignores what has occurred with other deaths since. More than just the virus is at stake in this.
. "
